$5,080,000
Negligence
Negligence from a utility caused fire.
Case Results
$3,600,000
Negligence
Negligence from a utility caused fire.
$2,300,000
Negligence
Kidnapping from a day care center in the greater Seattle Washington area.
$5,736,000
Negligence
Negligence from a utility caused fire.
$1,150,000
Inverse Condemnation and Negligence
Blalock v. Otay Water District – Jury Verdict $680,000.00 and $1,150,000 Settlement After Attorney Fee Motion. Jury verdict for Plaintiffs against Otay Water District (OTW) when water from a fresh main water-line exploded outside of plaintiffs home, destroying their house and koi farm. It was proven that OTW, a governmental agency, “took” plaintiffs land by…
$1,000,000
Negligence; Nuisance
Flooding of Plaintiffs’ home caused by Aquarium Maintenance company
$2,400,000
Inverse Condemnation; Nuisance; Trespass
Mass tort involving 50+ Plaintiff homeowners from flooding caused by a California Utility in San Diego County.
$3,940,000
Personal Injury FELA
James Russell Collins v. Union Pacific railroad – The case went to the California Supreme Court on the issue of whether the FELA could be applied to a non-railroad employee under the borrowed servant doctrine. The Supreme Court agreed that it could.
$2,200,000
Inverse Condemnation, Nuisance, Trespass
Inverse Condemnation, Nuisance, Trespass caused by a California Utility
$160,000
Negligence
Negligence caused by faulty Window Repair Installation in Plaintiffs’ home in El Cajon, California
$300,000
Breach of Contract
Wrongful conversion of property of Plaintiffs’ inheritance.
$225,000
Inverse Condemnation
Single family home flooded from failed municipal waterline.
$300,000
Inverse Condemnation
Loss of property caused by a governmental utility.
$500,000
Personal Injury
Cement truck hose striking and injuring plaintiff.
$400,000
Inverse Condemnation; Nuisance; Trespass
Loss of Business/Loss of Income/Loss of Profits in Santa Barbara, CA from smoke damage caused by a California Utility.
$700,000
Inverse Condemnation; Nuisance; Trespass
Trespass – Flooding of Plaintiffs home is caused by a California Utility in Montecito, CA.
$1,100,000
Insurance Bad Faith Settlement
Garcia v. American Securities Insurance Company – Richards Willis PC was retained by a United States Bankruptcy Trustee to recover proceeds on behalf of a bankruptcy estate. In a case settled prior to litigation, Richards Willis PC negotiated a $1,100,000.00 settlement which greatly benefited the bankruptcy estate and debtors.
$2,850,000
Civil Rights Violation As a Result of Kidnapping
Ramirez v. Escondido Unified School District – The case about father and child where the child was kidnapped out of a Escondido union school.
Confidential Settlement
Mass Tort Wildfire Litigation Fire
Witch Creek and Guijto Fires – Richards Willis PC represented dozens of Plaintiffs to confidential settlements. As reported by the San Diego Union Tribune, the Witch Creek fire began in the early afternoon of October 21, 2007, when sparking power lines ignited brush in a remote area southwest of Santa Ysabel during fierce Santa Ana…
$1,300,000
Negligence
Negligence from failure to maintain a storm water system
$435,000
Negligence
Negligence from failure to properly maintain a building which damages a tenant’s construction business
$275,000
Insurance Bad Faith
Insurance bad faith from a water loss
$215,000
Negligence
Negligence from an escalator in a mall
$95,000
Insurance Bad Faith
Insurance bad faith from a water loss
$275,000
Inverse Condemnation
Inverse Condemnation and Dangerous Condition of Public Property against a City
$1,890,000
Negligence
Negligence from a utility caused fire.
$1,470,000
Negligence
Negligence from a utility caused fire.
$1,303,000
Negligence
Negligence from a utility caused fire.
$115,000
Inverse Condemnation
Inverse Condemnation and Dangerous Condition of Public Property against a public utility
$3,145,000
Negligence
Negligence from a utility caused fire.
$2,750,000
Negligence
Negligence from a utility caused fire.
$1,280,000
Negligence
Negligence from a utility caused fire.
Every case is different and results depend on their specific circumstances. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.